
| Case Studies Home » Edition 14 Study | Differentiated Study | Study Summary | Downloads | All Studies |
Protecting the marketing mix through intellectual property rights |
Short for time? Try the study summary
or try the shorter, simpler differentiated study. You can also listen to this page. |
||||
Introduction
Consider the development of a product such as a mobile phone. The manufacturer needs physical resources such as offices, factories and machines - but what really makes the difference between different phones? The value in many products is not the physical materials – for example, the metals and plastics that are used. Mobile phones are shaped by ideas: improved technology leading to, for example, faster communications, music and digital photography, 'cool' designs and world-class brands. Think of the value in an iPod or a downloadable song. Intellectual property is often more valuable than warehouses and office blocks. This may be described as a knowledge economy. There are several ways in which the Intellectual Property Office can help a business to protect its intellectual property (IP). A company like Apple uses these safeguards to patent its inventions and register its designs. These protections can be applied across the world. For example:
To see how important IP protection is in practice, this case study looks at how one technology company, Forensic Pathways, has used these legal safeguards for a new development. In the UK there are now over 70 million mobile phones in use. The vast majority are used legitimately, but mobile phones are also used by criminals and terrorists. Computer technology can now analyse calls and messages from many different mobiles at once. A computer program that could plot, map and analyse that data so that criminal networks could be identified would be valuable. How would the developer protect the product before reaching the market?
If a competitor developed an equivalent product based directly on Forensic Pathways' software, all Forensic Pathway's work would be undermined. The company would incur the development costs but not have the opportunity to recover those costs by being first to market. To prevent this happening, it took steps to protect its intellectual property rights from the beginning of the development process. |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
The Times 100 invites you to link to its study material from your website.
Copyright © The Times Newspapers Ltd and MBA Publishing Ltd 1995-2010